A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving prospective neighbours around the construction of a wall at a coastal web page inside a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated national consideration next an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed family residence at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of planning breaches, environmental worries, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Moments posting about René Collier and also the Irish Periods report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a local disagreement has evolved right into a very publicised authorized struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design operates at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a company director respectively, seek out to develop their family property. The situation is now emblematic of broader disputes together Ireland’s coastline, the place improvement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of established inhabitants. In accordance with the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being manufactured by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted less than planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those residents of Dublin Road, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their preparing permission by developing a wall past the boundaries of their web-site, resulting in an encroachment on a Unique Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such spots are matter to demanding controls under European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have lasting ecological effects, specifically in a very delicate coastal atmosphere for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their organizing permission, and say the wall, which is partly constructed, is in the correct situation. Their authorized group has characterised the action as an make an effort to delay or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The pair accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their watch, an allegation that has been repeated in courtroom and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal scheduling disputes, in which views of the sea are both of those hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable attempts with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, Based on sworn proof referenced within the Irish Instances. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waistline-large drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, a picture which includes considering that turn into emblematic on the depth from the dispute. These actions weren't just symbolic; they had been meant to Obtain Visible evidence in the wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from your sea Irish Moments reported, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the drinking water for the duration of critical climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm h2o to photograph the positioning turned Just about the most putting descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Times article about accountant Paul Feely observed that these kinds of steps were cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief the wall extended into a region influenced by tidal movement, strengthening their argument which the SAC was getting encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being covered intimately from the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 grew to become broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to grasp the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard additional submissions on whether interim orders must be granted to halt design pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial minute inside the authorized timeline.
At the Main of your dispute is really a disagreement more than boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain the wall, as produced, goes over and above what was authorized and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be called meticulous in his assessment of setting up documents, maps, and ailments attached on the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental protection and adherence to scheduling legislation. They reject promises that the situation is about preserving A personal see, insisting as a substitute that it's about guaranteeing that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got explained their lengthy-standing connection to the realm and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a few basically wanting to establish a spouse and children home in accordance While using the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Exclusive Region of Conservation and say that every one is effective have been performed based upon Qualified tips and accredited programs. Their attorneys have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the fundamental info.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how setting up disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute above building of wall at coastal internet site is becoming a shorthand description for the condition a large number of observers see as ever more prevalent. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation in between non-public land, public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Instances article about René Collier noted which the businessman had Earlier been associated with nearby advocacy on organizing and environmental troubles, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from very different Skilled backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-higher drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded via waistline-superior water all through a storm to photograph the location Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared consistently in coverage, reflecting both the Bodily truth on the coastline and also the symbolic mother nature from the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an too much approach.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result stays uncertain. The court should decide whether the wall as constructed complies with organizing permission and no matter if any encroachment into a Particular Location of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and organizing situations. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who must live together with each other long following the legal prices are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design performs at the website on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation lengthen further than that tackle. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. Furthermore, it underscores how rapidly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when basic problems for instance environmental protection and house legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre of your dispute stands partially crafted, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved legal thoughts. Whether or not it can finally be altered, eliminated, or accomplished as prepared will rely upon the court docket’s results. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will probably carry on René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site to look in headlines, joined indelibly to The most intently watched scheduling disputes in north Dublin in recent years.